I'm kinda hate of being putted the screw on me to have a lenghty explanation so i can get 20 marks or i have to write 20,000 words to pass the assignment, and therewith passing the subject or achieve a higher grade. I feel disturbedly stupid to completely bound this kind of rule, format or system even though i could have to. I never knew there were a rule for PhD which is must have a certain total of words of pages in order to make it pass. As long as it follows the formats and have a sufficient detailed elucidation, then it should be no problem. Then, why must straining that bullshit into the lower level student threatening them they will get a nasty mark or fail if they don't follow it?
Why bother to make the life and thing more complicated when there is a way much more simpler and convenient to settle the crap? Why is our learning system is far away from reflecting the actuality of the true realm of world's nature and real life practical? I don't think the smart person is the one who could explain with extra plentiful words or pages, but the real smart people is the one who could make the detailed explanation clearly ample. That's what i believe. I'm valuing thin volume of justification that is worth and sufficient, than vast word's amount of yada yada and bullshit. I don't think everyone will deny and disagree this kind of reality we faced if the situation comes out such as this. Why have to spend more when there is a retrenchment way? Then, why we waste more time, more energy and more thinking when there is easiest way to make it done?
What could i suggest is it wasn't a problem in the first to set up certain words or pages when assign the student for work if it's just a guide. If this becoming a blackmail trade, then this is totally broken and asshole.
What could i suggest is it wasn't a problem in the first to set up certain words or pages when assign the student for work if it's just a guide. If this becoming a blackmail trade, then this is totally broken and asshole.
No comments:
Post a Comment